GIS Data Catalog
Urban Growth Boundary for King County
Learn how to get an ArcGIS Online account πΊ
Summary
The Growth Management Act requires King County's Comprehensive Plan to designate an Urban Growth Area; where most future urban growth and development is to occur to limit urban sprawl; enhance open space; protect rural areas and more efficiently use human services; transportation and utilities.
Description
Current King County Urban Growth Area Boundaries
The Comprehensive Plan designates an UGA which includes areas and densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is projected to occur in the County for the succeeding 20-year period.
Layer is created in reference to King County ordinances that established and amended the Urban Growth Areas.
The main point of refference is the cadastral layer maintained by King County Department of the Assessor.
Layer information
| Layer Name | urban_growth_line |
| Subject Category | Planning |
| Title | Urban Growth Boundary for King County |
| Feature Count | 9 |
| Feature Type | Line |
| Next Update | Annually |
| Spatial reference | EPSG:2926 |
| Place Keywords | Washington State, King County, WA, Pacific NW |
| Theme Keywords | Urban Growth, Land Use, Planning, Planningcadastre |
| Supplemental Information | None |
Attribute information
|
OBJECTID
From ESRI |
Description
Internal feature number. DomainSequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated. |
|
UGALINE
No Source Noted |
Description
Indicates if the feature is an internal King County Urban Growth Bounday or coincident with the King County Boundary Domain1 - Urban Growth Boundary 0 - King County Boundary |
|
EDITDATE
No Source Noted |
Description
Date feature was most recently modified DomainNot Found |
|
USERID
No Source Noted |
Description
Network ID of user who most recently modified the feature DomainNot Found |
|
SHAPE
From ESRI |
Description
Feature geometry. DomainCoordinates defining the features. |
|
Shape.STLength()
From SQL Server |
Description
Returns the total length of the elements in a geometry instance. DomainDouble |
Contact information
| Maintained by | DLS - Permitting |
| Primary |
Paul McCombs
paul.mccombs@kingcounty.gov |
Terms of Use
| License | Terms of use and copyright |
Use this Data
|
Links
How to use in ArcGIS Pro |
|
| Sharing Status | Not Public |
Summary
The Growth Management Act requires King County's Comprehensive Plan to designate an Urban Growth Area; where most future urban growth and development is to occur to limit urban sprawl; enhance open space; protect rural areas and more efficiently use human services; transportation and utilities.
Description
Current King County Urban Growth Area Boundaries
The Comprehensive Plan designates an UGA which includes areas and densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is projected to occur in the County for the succeeding 20-year period.
Layer is created in reference to King County ordinances that established and amended the Urban Growth Areas.
The main point of refference is the cadastral layer maintained by King County Department of the Assessor.
Contact information
| Maintained by | DLS - Permitting |
| Primary |
Paul McCombs
paul.mccombs@kingcounty.gov |
Terms of use and copyright
| License | Terms of use and copyright |
Change history
| 6/12/2025 |
Implemented Land Use and Zoning map amendments from the 2024 King County Comp Plan Amendment ordinance #19881, Effective January 2nd, 2025. Changed shape field type to MS SQL Server Native geometry. |
| 6/17/2021 |
Implemented KCCP2020 LUMA changes that affected Urban Growth Boundary due to requirement for UGA: LUMA 5.a - East Cougar Mountain; LUMA 6 - Maple Valley UGA Changes. These changes had previously been implemented in the layer after the adoption of the 2020 KC Comprehensive Plan, then rolled-back due to changes to the corresponding King County Countywide Planing Policies needing to be ratified, which happened June 1, 2021. |
| 11/24/2020 |
+ ~maint.DDES.KCCP2020_UGB_line~ + Rolled-back KCCP2020 LUMA changes that affected Urban Growth Boundary due to requirement for UGA: LUMA 2 - Woodinville Roundabout; LUMA 5.a - East Cougar Mountain; LUMA 6 - Maple Valley UGA Changes. |
| 10/7/2020 |
Correct boundary changed by 2020 King County Comprehensive Plan Update LUMA 1 - Woodinville Roundabout |
| 9/25/2020 |
Implement 2020 King County Comprehensive Plan Update, Land Use Map Amendments (attachment D) and Special District Overlay amending sections in the main body of the ordinance. Adopting Ordinance is #19146 - Final Action 7/24/2020 - Effective Date is 8/20/2020. |
| 1/27/2017 |
Made changes to the urban growth area as adopted in the 2016 King County Comprehensive Plan ordinance #18427, December 5th 2016 |
| 9/3/2015 |
Added Rainier Ridge 4 to 1 to the urban area in the vicinity of Black Diamond. |
| 1/29/2015 |
Moved Skyokmish UGB to match redrawn cadastral Data. Merged features into minimum number required to have begining and endpoints of features only where required to define the Urban Growth Area polygon's topology corners. Removed many gaps and overlaps in the process. The direction of the features has been edited such that rural areas are always on the same side of the features. |
| 6/11/2014 |
Made alignments with redrawn (improved spatial accuracy) cadastral layer in the vicinity of Maple Valley Grand Ridge annexation. Also cleaned up some overlapping arcs in other portions of the county. |
| 1/29/2013 |
Implemented changes adopted by 2012 King County Comprehensive Plan. Adjusted some features to align with parcels that have been redrawn in the vicinity of other features updated. |
| 1/1/2002 |
In 2002, the entire UGA/UGB data set was rigorously checked against implementing ordinance sources and made to match the then current KC parcel layer. |
| 1/1/1994 |
With the Advent of GIS in King County the "urban growth boundary line" was implemented in GIS and an "Urban Growth Area" polygon layer was derived from it. The actual features in the "Urban Growth Area" and "Urban Growth Boundary" GIS layers were generally derived from a series of parcel GIS layers that were developed for each Community Plan that was adopted in the 1980s. Some additional features were drawn in from other GIS layers such as streams, and Still other features were added via Coordinate Geometry functions, or digitized from other paper maps. The layers were subject to the same annual amendment process each subsequent year until present. As the changes were made each year the changing portions of the layer would be positionally adjusted to best match the latest version of the KC Parcel layer. |
| 1/1/1985 |
The 1985 KC Comprehensive Plan included an "urban growth boundary line" this line was delineated by KC urban planners following roads, parcels lines and other geographic features depicted on manually drafted zoning maps. The line as delineated by planners was modified by KC Council and adopted. Each year a process of amending the urban growth boundary was undertaken, the planners would propose changes, the Council would individually accept or deny each change and optionally make additional changes. |
| Update 14 |
Updated (technical correction in Samammish area - alignment with Complu) |
| Update 15 |
Edited to match parcels in Section 17 T 25 R 06. Migrated to SDE feature class. |